Previous: Occupiers’ liability
There are two types of nuisance: public nuisance and private nuisance. The former is a criminal offence, while the latter is a tort between land owners.
The criminal offence of committing a public nuisance was defined in R v Rimmington  as an act not authorised by law which omits to discharge a legal duty as endangering life, health, property, comfort or public rights of a class of persons in a common way. On the facts of the case, sending 538 racist letters was not classed as a public nuisance. Winfield and Jolowicz defined a public nuisance as an interference materially affects the comfort and convenience of life of a class of the public.
Public nuisances may be restrained by an injunction applied for by the Attorney General. They may be applied for directly, or on behalf of a local authority under s 222 of the Local Government Act 1972. For example, in A-G (on the relation of Glamorgan CC) v PYA Quarries , where an injunction was successfully granted to prevent the defendant causing vibrations, dust and noise. Wandsworth LBC v Railtrak  concerned a public nuisance caused by pigeon excrement on the defendant’s railway bridge.
Liability in tort
As aptly summarised by Winfield, it is possible for a person to sue for damages caused by a public nuisance if that person has suffered ‘special damage’ above others. For example, in Rose v Miles , a canal blockage was a public nuisance, and the costs of alternative transport could be awarded...
To continue reading, purchase access to all Tort Law notes (£5)
2) Purchase access (£5)
Already purchased? Login with Facebook.