Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Sledmore v Dalby [1996]


  • The Sledmores owned a house, and represented to his son and daughter-in-law (The Dalbys) that the house would belong to them
  • The Dalbys expended money improving the house, and lived in the house rent-free for many years
  • Following Mr Sledmore’s death, Mrs Sledmore sought sole possession of the house


  • Could Mrs Sledmore be estopped from acquiring sole possession?


  • No


  • Although an equity by way of proprietary estoppel had been established, its value had been exhausted by the free accommodation provided
  • Mrs Sledmore’s dire financial situation and the Dalbys’ rare use of the house could be taken into consideration
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News