Facts
- The claimant procured sales of jewellery for the defendant
- Although the claimant was never in control of stock, he traded in his own name
Issue
- Was the claimant protected by the Commercial buy discount xanax online Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993?
Decision
- No
Reasoning
- Conclusion on one’s own behalf cannot constitute concluding on another’s behalf
- Sagal did not negotiate or conclude on Atelier’s behalf; he simply communicated orders