Facts
- A 6 month periodic tenancy provided for determination by the landlord on 3 months’ notice if the landlord could show that he needed the land for his business premises
Issue
- Was this notice requirement enough to provide certainty of duration for a fixed term lease
Decision
- Yes
Reasoning
- The notice requirement was certain buy generic alprazolam online enough for the parties
- It was preferable to hold parties to their intended bargains than to uphold a requirement of unqualified determination
- This preference was overruled in Centaploy v Matlodge [1974]
- For the other requirements of periodic tenancies, please visit land law notes on leases
