Facts
- A slot machine was purchased by the claimant following the signing of a contract which removed all warranties
Issue
- Could damages be claimed for its defectiveness?
Decision
- No
Reasoning
- The terms were agreed to by the claimant, by signature, which is powerful evidence of assent
- This case symbolises the principle of freedom of contract, whereby parties to a contract are thought to be best placed to decide whether or not they wish to be bound by that contract
