Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Irvine v Watson (1880)

Facts

  • The defendant (principal) employed an agent to purchase oil
  • The claimant (third party) delivered the oil to the agent
  • The the party paid his agent
  • The agent became insolvent, meaning that the third party did not receive its money

Issue

  • Had the principal discharged his payment obligation to the third party?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • Rarely should a third party be denied a remedy to a principal; the principal buy blue xanax online takes on the risk of using an agent in disclosed agency
  • Obiter: this case doubted Armstrong v Stokes (1872)
  • Obiter: a third party should only pay an agent if authority has been given by the principal to the agent to receive the payment (so be careful, third parties)
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News