Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]


  • The defendant opened a manhole cover and left it overnight, marked with a paraffin lamp
  • The claimant 8 year old boy knocked the lamp into the hole, causing an explosion which burned him


  • Was the damage foreseeable?


  • Yes


  • The kind of damage, burning, was foreseeable, therefore the damage actually sustained was also foreseeable (note magnitude exception in Doubty v Turner [1964])
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News