Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Hill v Tupper (1863)

Facts

  • An easement was granted to the claimant for his sole us of mooring rights on a canal

Issue

  • Could this be a valid easement?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • An easement must accommodate dominant land. It may not constitute a purely anticompetitive right for the benefit of a business
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News