Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Hazell v Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council [1992]

Facts

  • The council carried out prospective transactions with public money in an attempt to raise capital

Issue

  • Were such transactions ultra vires

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • The function was not ancillary to the council’s permitted functions and so was not covered by s 111 of the Local Government Act 1972
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News