Facts
- An ex-employee pursued a course of conduct in order to try and expose alleged illegal financial dealings made by his ex-employer
- S 1(3)(a) of the Protection for Harassment Act creates a defence to harassment if the defendant is reasonably buy xanax from canada online preventing or detecting crime
Issue
- Was the defendant’s act prevented from constituting harassment by s 1(3)(a)?
Decision
- No
Reasoning
- Acts must be rational for the defence to succeed
