Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Fitzwilliam v Richall Holdings Services [2013]

Facts

  • Fitzwillaim’s land had been fraudulently transferred to Richall Holdings Services as a result of a forged power of attorney

Issue

  • Could Fitzwilliam have the register corrected?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Although the court (High Court) was bound by buy alprazolam paypal Enterprises v Cheshire Homes [2002]” href=”https://webstroke.co.uk/law/cases/malory-enterprises-v-cheshire-homes-2002″>Malory Enterprises v Cheshire Homes [2002] (Court of Appeal), it criticised the outcome as a backwards steps in ensuring the certainty of the land register
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News