Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Dimmock v Hallett [1866]

Facts

  • In selling some farm land, the defendant told the claimant that all of the farms were under tenancy, which was factually true
  • The defendant failed to mention that all of the tenants had given notice to vacate their land

Issue

  • Could the contract of sale be rescinded?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Misleading to omit such vital information where the reason for the question was clear
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News