Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Dimes v Grand Junction Canal Proprietors [1852]


  • Regarding the sale of land crossed by a canal, a value had to be decided by the judge


  • Could the decision be quashed as the judge had a significant number of shares in the defendant company


  • Yes


  • The decision, had it been upheld, would have been to the significant financial benefit to the judge
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News