Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004]

Facts

  • A purchaser purchased land subject to a restrictive covenant
  • The covenant did not disclose the extent of the benefitted land

Issue

  • Was the covenant enforceable?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • It would be oppressive for a purchaser to have to establish the extent of the benefit of a covenant; the land benefitted must be easily ascertainable – it wasn’t on these facts
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News