Wilkinson v Kerdene [2013]

Facts

  • The defendants (Wilkinson) purchased a bungalow in a holiday village later owned by Kerdene Ltd, which sought to restore the village after it had fallen into disrepair
  • The conveyance contained a right to use recreational facilities and roads within the village, and a (separate) obligation to pay an annual fee to Kerdene Ltd for village maintenance

Issue

  • Was the covenant enforceable by Kerdene Ltd?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Under the doctrine of benefit and burden, the right and obligation were linked
  • As the fee could not be apportioned, and a fair amount of the fee would be put towards maintaining the defendant’s benefit, the whole fee was enforceable
  • This case was decided amongst 8 cases which involved the holiday village, and 100 separate claims against all of the bungalows owned in the village – most were settled out of court
RELATED CASE  London County Council v Allen [1914]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 27th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy