White & Carter v McGregor 
- There was a contract to carry out an advertising campaign
- The defendant told the claimant that the campaign had not been authorised and would not be paid for
- The claimant continued with the campaign and the defendant refused to pay
- Were the defendants liable
- No duty to mitigate loss where debt to be paid
Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 29th April 2014