Waltons Stores Ltd v Maher [1988]

Facts

  • Waltons Stores represented that they wished to replace a building owned by Maher
  • In reliance of this representation, Maher demolished the existing building and started building a new one

Issue

  • Could Waltons be estopped from denying the (as yet non-existent) contract

Decision

  • Yes, claim allowed

Reasoning

  • There was a reliance interest awarded and an expectation interest
  • Equity can intervene to protect non-contractual assurances
RELATED CASE  Bridge v Campbell Discount Co [1962]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 4th October 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy