Vick v Vogle-Gapes [2006]

Facts

  • Vogle-Gapes (principal) reduced the territorial scope of Vick’s (agent) activities
  • Vick sued for Vogle-Gape’s breach of his duty of good faith

Issue

  • What is the extent of the duties of good faith imposed by regulation 3 and 4 on agents and principals under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993? Was this duty breached?

Decision

  • To not act in a way calculated or likely to damage or destroy the agency relationship; no

Reasoning

  • Damages not payable
  • The reduction of territorial scope was reasonable in the circumstances
  • For the purposes of regulation 8, an agency agreement may specify the length of the┬áreasonable time period
RELATED CASE  Adler v Ananhall Advisory and Consultancy Services [2009]

Posted in Commercial Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 16th January 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy