Thorner v Major [2009]


  • The claimant had worked for the late-defendant’s estate for 30 years, unpaid
  • He believed that he would inherit the farm, following non-explicit but obvious communications from the defendant
  • Upon the defendant’s death, his estate passed by statue, not to the claimant


  • Could the transfer by statute be estopped by proprietary estoppel?


  • Yes, claim allowed


  • Although no clear assurances had been made, proprietary estoppel requires only that assurances are ‘clear enough’, they need not be ‘clear and unequivocal’
  • Proprietary estoppel can only operate on identified property, which may fluctuate in value
  • The judge’s ruling that the farm should be inherited was restored by the House of Lords
RELATED CASE  Banco de Portugal v Waterlow & Sons [1932]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy