Thomas v Sorrell (1673)

Facts

  • Sorrel sold alcohol without a licence

Issue

  • Was Sorrel in breach of statute?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • According to Chief Justice Vaughan:

    “A dispensation or license properly passeth no interest, nor alters or transfers property in anything, but only makes an action lawful, which without it had been unlawful.”

RELATED CASE  Neilson-Jones v Fedden [1975]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy