Tame v New South Wales [2003]

Facts

  • Following an accident, the claimant made an insurance claim
  • the police erroneously filled out her blood alcohol reading
  • Although the insurance company paid out, the error caused significant mental injury to the claimant

Issue

  • Could there be a mental injury claim against the police for this error

Decision

  • No liability

Reasoning

  • Not foreseeable that a mistake on a form could cause such injuries
  • A police officer’s primary function of filling the form in was to give to his superior officers
  • Primary/Secondary victim classifications disregarded in favour of foreseeability alone; if there is a relationship
RELATED CASE  Goldman v Hargrave [1967]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 14th January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy