Spencer v Harding [1869]

Facts

  • Harding issued a call for tenders, with a 7 day submission window
  • Harding accepted a tender on the first day of the window
  • Spencer submitted a better tender within the window but after a ‘winning’ tender had been accepted on the first day

Issue

  • Was a call for tenders capable of being a contractual offer to sell to the highest bidder

Decision

  • No offer, simply an invitation to treat

Reasoning

  • A call for tenders is an invitation to treat, and is not a contractual offer
  • The defendant did not need to sell to the highest bidder, other factors may have been involved
RELATED CASE  McCrone v Boots Farm Sales [1980]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 9th January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy