Samuel v Jarrah Timber [1904]

Facts

  • A mortgage was granted over stock,which gave the mortgagee the option to purchase the stock
  • The mortgagee purported to exercise the option

Issue

  • Was the option enforceable?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • Having an option to purchase the stock would undermine a mortgagor’s right to redeem his mortgage
  • This likely applies to mortgages of real property also (land), such that an option to buy a fee simple estate in a mortgage agreement would not be enforceable
RELATED CASE  B&Q v Liverpool and Lancashire Properties [2001]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 28th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy