Rylands v Fletcher [1868]

Facts

  • The defendant (Rylands) had a reservoir┬áconstructed for him by contractors
  • Upon filling the reservoir, the claimant’s (Fletcher) colliery was flooded
  • There was no negligence claim

Issue

  • Could a nuisance claim be made?

Decision

  • No, but claim allowed under new ‘Rylands v Fletcher’ tort

Reasoning

  • Rylands v Fletcher tort is a strict liability tort making liable any land owner who stores items of mischief which escape and cause damage to a landowner who suffers damage as a result of that escape if the escape was not caused by an ‘act of God’ or the claimant
RELATED CASE  Tremain v Pike [1969]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 25th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy