Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989]


  • A lease provided that premises could only be used as a high class restaurant or night club, with a covenant prohibiting immoral use
  • The premises were used for an immoral purpose (prostitution)
  • The lessor commenced forfeiture proceedings


  • Could relief from forfeiture be granted?


  • Yes, exceptionally


  • Usually, a breach of covenant against immoral use will not allow relief from forfeiture to be granted
  • Exceptionally, such a relief can be granted (even though the lease had been forfeited)
  • Exceptional circumstances here included
    • the substantial loss which forfeiture would cause to the lessee (and windfall to the lessor)
    • the fact that the immoral use had ended
    • the fact that there would be no lasting stigma
    • the fact that relief would not cause the lessor to be left with unacceptable tenants
    • the fact that the lessee intended to dispose of the lease
RELATED CASE  Antoniades v Villiers [1990]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 3rd April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy