Reeve v Lisle 
This case found that an equity of redemption would not be a destroyed by an option granted to a mortgagor to purchase mortgaged property if that option was contained in a separate agreement to that for the mortgage. The later case of Samuel v Jarrah Timber  illustrates this separation distinction.
Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 28th April 2015
© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms