R v Thabo Meli [1954]


  • The defendant caused the intoxication of the victim, before rolling him off a cliff to kill him
  • The victim dies of exposure while lying at the bottom of the cliff


  • Did the defendant cause the death of the victim?


  • Yes


  • Although the doctrine of coincidence requires the actus reus and mens rea of a crime to coincide in time, the course of conduct of murder continued up until the victim’s death
RELATED CASE  R v Goodfellow [1986]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy