R v Thabo Meli [1954]

Facts

  • The defendant caused the intoxication of the victim, before rolling him off a cliff to kill him
  • The victim dies of exposure while lying at the bottom of the cliff

Issue

  • Did the defendant cause the death of the victim?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Although the doctrine of coincidence requires the actus reus and mens rea of a crime to coincide in time, the course of conduct of murder continued up until the victim’s death
RELATED CASE  R v Moloney [1985]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy