R v Pitts (1842)


  • The victim died as a result of drowning after an argument with Pitts
  • It appeared that the victim jumped into the river while trying to escape from the argument


  • Did Pitts cause the death?


  • No


  • Although on the facts, the jury found Pitts not guilty, it was said that if the escape was a reasonable act of escape, the defendant should remain responsible for the resulting harm
RELATED CASE  R v Lambert [2001]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy