R v Matthews and Alleyne [2003]


  • The defendants threw the victim into a river where he drowned, not intending the death of the victim, as the victim should have been able to swim


  • Did the defendants murder the victim?


  • Yes


  • Although the conviction was safe, the judge erred in finding that R v Woollin [1999] laid down a rule of law
  • The Woollin criteria is a rule of evidence: a jury direction which entitles a jury to find intent if the resulting death was virtually certain; it does not require a jury to find intent from virtual certainty
RELATED CASE  R v Piper [2007]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 25th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy