R v Holland [1841]

Facts

  • Holland caused severe wounds to the victim, particularly to his finger
  • The victim was advised that was a high chance that he would die if he did not have his finger amputated
  • The victim refused the amputation and died as a result

Issue

  • Did Holland cause the victim’s death?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Refusing medical treatment, even where unreasonable, will not be classed as a supervening event
RELATED CASE  R v Dhaliwal [2006]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy