R v Gore (1611)

Facts

  • The defendant intended to kill his wife, and attempted to do so by adding some poison to some medicine intended for her
  • The defendant’s wife complained that the medicine was not carrying out its true purpose, and so took it back to a chemist, who involuntarily mixed in the poison and consumed the mixture
  • The chemist died as a result of the poison

Issue

  • Did the defendant murder the chemist?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Malice can be transferred
RELATED CASE  R v Adomako [1995]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy