R v Gaming Board, ex p Benaim 
- An informant reported that Benaim was not fit to be a manager of a gaming club (Casino)
- Benaim’s licence was removed
- Could Benaim require that the informant’s identity is revealed?
- A fair decision had been made on the evidence, the informant was not under charge and therefore there was no reason for the revealing of his identity; only reasons to protect it, given the stereotype of gaming clubs at the time
Posted in Public Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 11th April 2014