R v Fulling [1987]

Facts

  • Fulling appealed that her confession had be obtained by oppression therefore could not be given as evidence in trial

Issue

  • Could the confession be presented as evidence

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Oppression should be given its normal meaning – harsh, wrongful, unjust or unfair – mind games are not oppressive
RELATED CASE  R v Chief Rabbi, ex p Wachmann [1993]

Posted in Public Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 21st April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy