R v Deyemi [2008]


  • The defendant was in possession of a firearm contrary to the Firearms Act 1968, which provided for a strict liability offence


  • Could a mens rea requirement be read into the statute


  • No


  • Where Parliament intends a strict liability offence, no mens rea requirement (of reasonable belief) will be read in
  • It is Parliament’s policy to prevent the spread of firearms
RELATED CASE  DPP v Newbury and Jones [1976]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 23rd December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy