R v Deyemi [2008]

Facts

  • The defendant was in possession of a firearm contrary to the Firearms Act 1968, which provided for a strict liability offence

Issue

  • Could a mens rea requirement be read into the statute

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • Where Parliament intends a strict liability offence, no mens rea requirement (of reasonable belief) will be read in
  • It is Parliament’s policy to prevent the spread of firearms
RELATED CASE  R v Dica [2004]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 23rd December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy