R v Dalloway (1847)


  • Dalloway let go of the reins of a horse
  • During his lack of control, the horse caused the death of a child


  • Could Dalloway be said to have caused the death of the child?


  • No


  • Although Dalloway was culpable for not keeping control of the horses reins, this act did not cause the death of the child
  • Control of the reins would not have prevented the child’s death
RELATED CASE  R v McKechnie [1992]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy