R v Clarke [1927]


  • The claimant, under investigation for the murder of 2 police officers, gave evidence which led to the conviction of another person, the actual murderer
  • There had been a reward of £1000 to anyone who gave such evidence


  • Could the claimant claim the reward, given that he had said in his interview that we was cooperating “exclusively in order to clear his name”


  • Claim failed, no recovery


  • It is necessary to act in reliance of a unilateral offer when accepting it. Mr Clarke was not acting upon the offer.
RELATED CASE  Chappel v Nestle [1960]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 22nd January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy