R v Broadcasting Complaints Commission, ex p Owen [1985]

Facts

  • Owen required there to be more political coverage of his party than there was currently
  • The BCC responded saying that it would be too resource consuming and against editorial judgment to implement this

Issue

  • Could the decision not to implement fairness be quashed for legally irrelevant reasons

Decision

  • No, claim failed

Reasoning

  • Were multiple reasons of given, take the legally relevant one’s out and decide on those
  • The resources argument was not legally relevant, however the editorial judgment argument was and the decision could not be quashed
RELATED CASE  Lavender & Son v Minister of Housing [1970]

Posted in Public Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 12th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy