R v Ahluwalia [1993]


  • Ahluwalia suffered through several years of domestic abuse from her husband
  • She ultimately ‘snapped’, poring petrol over her husband and setting it alight, burning him to death


  • Could Ahluwalia rely on the defence of provocation?


  • No


  • Ahluwalia’s response was the culmination of years of abuse, which did not fit within the definition of provocation
  • Ahluwalia was however, successful in appealing on the defence of diminished responsibility
  • Today, it is likely that Ahluwalia would be able to rely on the defence of loss of self-control
RELATED CASE  Hill v Baxter [1958]

Posted in Criminal Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 26th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy