Priestly v Fernie (1863)

Facts

  • The claimants succeeded in suing the master of a ship based on a bill of lading
  • The judgment obtained was not satisfied: the agent master of the ship failed to pay damages

Issue

  • Could an action based on the same bill of lading be made against the ship owner (the principal of the master)?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • The (opinion: pointless) doctrine of merger
RELATED CASE  Harper v Vigors Bros (1909)

Posted in Commercial Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 1st January 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy