Poseidon Chartering BV v Marianne Zeeschip Vof [2006, ECJ]

Facts

  • An agent had been authorised to conclude only one contract, but also its subsequent renewals

Issue

  • The European Court of Justice was asked to decide whether the agent had continuing authority or not, can u buy xanax such that he could claim the benefits of being a commercial agent

Decision

  • The agent was a commercial agent

Reasoning

  • Continuing authority logically means authorisation to negotiate or conclude more than one transaction
RELATED CASE  Dyster v Randall (1926)

Posted in Commercial Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 30th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy