Porter v Magill [2002]

Facts

  • Dame Shirley Porter organised and ran a scheme in which houses could be purchased by their residents for very low prices, in an effort to increase the chances of her re-election
  • The scheme was said to be illegal and so Dame Porter would face £31 million in personal liability if an investigation proved so

Issue

  • Could the resulting investigation’s decision be quashed where an initial press conference appeared to be biased

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • A new (and final) test of bias was found:

Whether the fair minded and informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility of bias.

  • Dame Shirley suddenly didn’t have any assets, but was eventually fined for a much lesser sum
RELATED CASE  Caswell v Dairy Produce Quota Tribunal [1990]

Posted in Public Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 11th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms