Peacock v Custins [2002]

Facts

  • The claimant was the owner of dominant land to an easement granting access to his land
  • The claimant used the easement to also access land adjoining the dominant land

Issue

  • Could the defendant stop the claimant using the easement to gain access to the adjoining land?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • This case reiterated the rule in Harris v Flower (1904) that a right of access may only be used for accessing the land to which access was granted
RELATED CASE  Wood v Waddington [2014]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 26th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy