Pau On v Lau Yiu Long [1980]

Facts

  • The claimant sought to enforce a guarantee, which the defendant claimed was signed under duress to avoid undermining public confidence

Issue

  • Could this contracted be voided due to duress

Decision

  • No claim

Reasoning

  • 4 factors are relevant in determining where to buy alprazolam 2mg whether duress exists: did the claimant protest; did they have alternative options; did they seek independent advice and did they take steps to avoid the contract
RELATED CASE  Steven v Bromley & Son [1919]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 19th January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy