Overbrooke Estates v Glencombe Properties [1974]

Facts

  • Auctioneers were employed as agents to sell goods for Overbrooke Estates as principal
  • Glencombe Properties placed the winning bid on Overbrooke’s property
  • The conditions of sale prevented the auctioneers from making any representation or warranty in relation to the property
  • The auctioneers falsely represented to Glencombe before their bid that the council had no plans to compulsorily purchase the property
  • The council subsequently announced its programme of compulsory purchases, which would include Glencombe’s new property

Issue

  • Could an order for specific performance be obtained?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Overbrooke were not responsible for the representation and apparent authority had been expressly denied, overruling the auctioneer’s representation
RELATED CASE  Koenisblatt v Sweet (1923)

Posted in Commercial Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 30th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy