Overbrooke Estates v Glencombe Properties [1974]


  • Auctioneers were employed as agents to sell goods for Overbrooke Estates as principal
  • Glencombe Properties placed the winning bid on Overbrooke’s property
  • The conditions of sale prevented the auctioneers from making any representation or warranty in relation to the property
  • The auctioneers falsely represented to Glencombe before their bid that the council had no plans to compulsorily purchase the property
  • The council subsequently announced its programme of compulsory purchases, which would include Glencombe’s new property


  • Could an order for specific performance be obtained?


  • Yes


  • Overbrooke were not responsible for the representation and apparent authority had been expressly denied, overruling the auctioneer’s representation
RELATED CASE  Poseidon Chartering BV v Marianne Zeeschip Vof [2006, ECJ]

Posted in Commercial Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 30th December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy