Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence [1996]

Facts

  • Mulcahy (an artilleryman) was deafened when standing next to a gun during battle

Issue

  • Was the officer who fired the gun liable for the deafness of Mulcahy

Decision

  • No liability

Reasoning

  • It was not fair, just or reasonable to expect an officer to make such considerations as to prevent such injuries during active war; policy prevented claim

Citation

[1996] EWCA Civ 1323

RELATED CASE  Chandler v Cape Plc [2012]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 3rd January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy