Moody v Steggles (1879)

Facts

  • An easement was granted in favour of a public house owner to affix a sign to adjoining property

Issue

  • Was this a valid easement?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • The easement did accommodate dominant land, despite also benefitting the business situated on the dominant land: it would continue to benefit successors in title to the dominant land
RELATED CASE  Re Ellenborough Park [1956]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 25th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy