Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire County Council [2000]


  • The defendants allowed some gypsies to reside on their land, which was adjacent to the claimant’s land
  • The gypsies caused a nuisance on the claimant’s land



  • Yes


  • The council’s land was used as a base for the nuisance and there was no highway involved, direct adjacency
  • Subtle distinction as Hussain likely decided wrongly
RELATED CASE  Holley v Sutton London Borough Council [2000]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 25th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy