Linden Gardens v Lenesta Sludge Disposal [1994]

Facts

  • A defective building was sold to a third party to the building contract foreseeably and immediately after the completion of its construction
  • The building contract explicitly excluded liability to third parties

Issue

  • Could the third party buyer hold the builders liable for their defective building work

Decision

  • Yes, claim allowed

Reasoning

  • The sale was foreseeable as was the subsequent loss
  • The contract had effectively been assigned to the buyer
RELATED CASE  Peyman v Lenjani [1985]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 20th January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy