L’Estrange v Graucob [1934]

Facts

  • A slot machine was purchased by the claimant following the signing of a contract which removed all warranties

Issue

  • Could damages be claimed for its defectiveness?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • The terms were agreed to by the claimant, by signature, which is powerful evidence of assent
  • This case symbolises the principle of freedom of contract, whereby parties to a contract are thought to be best placed to decide whether or not they wish to be bound by that contract
RELATED CASE  The HongKong Fir [1962]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 21st July 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy