Kenlin v Gardiner [1967]

Facts

  • A police officer¬†acknowledged¬†a 14 year old boy, who then ran away
  • The officer grabbed the boy, who proceeded to hit the officer to release himself

Issue

  • Had the boy assaulted the officer in the execution of his duty?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • He was not being detained, nor under arrest, therefore, he was allowed to defend himself against the officer’s battery
RELATED CASE  Congrieve v Home Office [1976]

Posted in Public Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 21st April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy